Model comparison
Command R vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 13.8.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1298 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1289 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.