Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.5 to 29.8.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1066 | 1299 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | 1289 |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1140 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1061 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.