Model comparison
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 19.4.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-27 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.19 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.13 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| ALE-Bench | 326.4 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 35.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | — |
| DTBench | 77.1% | — |
| LMCA | 31% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.26 | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 22.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 10.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 Flash better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Flash and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.