Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs QwQ-32B
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 2 categories and QwQ-32B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 39.2.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math QwQ-32B leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge QwQ-32B leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1378 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | 1297 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than QwQ-32B?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and QwQ-32B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.