Model comparison
Grok 3 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 13.7.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 40 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1314 |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | — |
Math Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |
Multilingual Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1292 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.