Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
GLM-4.5V and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 49.4.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1314 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1298 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
GLM-4.5V and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.5V or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.