Model comparison
Qwen1.5-72B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 34.9 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1166 | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1148 | 1299 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1164 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1136 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 28.8% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1135 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1186 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1084 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1104 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1049 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1110 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1142 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1166 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1137 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-72B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-72B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-72B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-72B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.