Model comparison
Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 38.5 to 28.1.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.075 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.