Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 9.0.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
GPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.538.8
Released2023-11-06—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$30—
Results tracked3614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding12681314
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts12511299
SimpleBench25.1%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25—
ForecastBench59.4—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math12721298
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
MATH Level 546.7%—

Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert12231289
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
MMLU81.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English12451265
LMArena Chinese12421314
LMArena German12591231
LMArena Japanese11941207
LMArena Russian12591271
LMArena French1276—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following12491275

Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query12541292

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text12721299
LMArena Creative Writing12691262
LMArena Multi-Turn12671299

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper