Model comparison
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Wizardlm 13b leads 19.4 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1101 | 1035 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1151 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |
Multilingual Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1135 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.