Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Wizardlm 13b in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.5 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1035 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1018 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1023 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1048 |
Long Context Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.1 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.