Model comparison
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-7B
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 20.4 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1101 | 1107 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | 1065 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1151 | 1080 |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | 1055 |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 62.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1135 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-7B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | 1058 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | 1062 |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.