Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 10.7.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 2K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 27B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.