Model comparison
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 38.0 to 34.1.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.0 | 34.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1173 | 1185 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | 1144 |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1110 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1101 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | 1142 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1113 | 1158 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-110B leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1107 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.9 vs 33.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.