Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Wizardlm 70b
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 60.3 to 56.3.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1079 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1093 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.