Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 33.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1185 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1144 |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1150 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1141 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1158 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.8 vs 32.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen1.5-110B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.