Model comparison

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 32.9.

Side by side

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Phi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.034.3
Released—2026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked173

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode—32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%
LMArena Coding1130—

Reasoning Too close to call

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1127—

Math Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Math1173—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Expert1108—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1094—
LMArena Chinese1108—
LMArena French1110—
LMArena German1101—
LMArena Japanese1042—
LMArena Korean954—
LMArena Russian1145—
LMArena Spanish1095—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1113—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1120—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1138—
LMArena Creative Writing1107—
LMArena Multi-Turn1088—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper