Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.8 to 31.4.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is phi-3-medium 14B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.