Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 32.2 to 23.1.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.