Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 70b leads 34.8 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1081 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1079 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1116 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1093 |
Long Context Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Wizardlm 70b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.