Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 29.6 to 9.1.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1130 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1127 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.18 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1173 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1109 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is phi-3-medium 14B or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.