Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 25.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1299 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.