Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 67.2 to 56.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1314 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1298 |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1289 |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1299 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.