Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 7b Instruct
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.5 to 24.0.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1016 |
Reasoning GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 993 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1007 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.