Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.