Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 20.7.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | — |
| LMArena German | 1231 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.