Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.