Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 27.1.
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | 1299 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | 1289 |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1006 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.