Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3-1.7B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 15.4.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 26.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.