Model comparison
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen3-1.7B
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.9 to 15.4.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 26.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | — |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1173 | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | — |
| LMArena French | 1109 | — |
| LMArena German | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1106 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.