Model comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x22B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 35.2 to 24.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 72.4% for Mixtral 8x22B and 78% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x22B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Mixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index27.132.7
Released2024-04-17—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11661210
WeirdML3.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct40.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.2%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+64.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11501208
DTBench55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.03—
ForecastBench56.3—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Omni-MATH16.3%16.1%
LMArena Math11841208
MATH Level 524.2%—

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro46%41.4%
GPQA (HELM)33.4%28.7%
GPQA Diamond34.1%—
LMArena Expert1113—
MMLU77.8%—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11281160
LMArena Chinese11161192
LMArena Russian11581187
LMArena French1166—
LMArena German1141—
LMArena Japanese1037—
LMArena Korean1057—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
IFEval72.4%78%
LMArena Instruction Following11471186

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11441194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text11621218
LMArena Creative Writing11411199
WildBench71.1%73.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn11301221

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x22B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mixtral 8x22B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper