Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen Turbo
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 15.3.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen Turbo?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.