Model comparison

Mixtral 8x7B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 61.5 to 51.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 57.5% for Mixtral 8x7B and 78% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x7B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Mixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index27.132.7
Released2023-12-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window32K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.70—
Output $ / M tokens$0.70—
Results tracked3816

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11261210
HumanEval+39.6%—
MBPP+49.7%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11151208
DTBench49.6%—
Adversarial NLI55.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.47—
ForecastBench56.3—
HellaSwag86.7%—
PIQA83.6%—
WinoGrande77.2%—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Omni-MATH10.5%16.1%
LMArena Math11471208
MATH Level 510%—
GSM8K74.4%—

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro33.5%41.4%
GPQA (HELM)29.6%28.7%
GPQA Diamond30.6%—
LMArena Expert1088—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.3%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA85.8%—
TriviaQA82.2%—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10771160
LMArena Chinese10551192
LMArena Russian10901187
LMArena French1166—
LMArena German1114—
LMArena Japanese931—
LMArena Korean968—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
IFEval57.5%78%
LMArena Instruction Following11091186

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11031194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text11321218
LMArena Creative Writing11091199
WildBench67.3%73.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn11151221

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mixtral 8x7B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper