Model comparison

o4-mini vs Qwen3-1.7B

o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

o4-mini OpenAI

41.6

Rank #132 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. o4-mini scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where o4-mini leads 40.8 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 81.7% for o4-mini and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
  • Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o4-mini and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
o4-miniQwen3-1.7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.626.6
Released2025-04-162025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.10—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked604

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

o4-mini: 40.9 (#127), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)45%—
Aider Polyglot72%—
GSO3.6%—
WeirdML52.6%—
LMArena Coding1368—
CadEval62%—
ALE-Bench826.17—
AlgoTune1.72—

Agentic & Tool Use o4-mini leads

o4-mini: 32.6 (#61), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard53.2%28.4%
GDPval25.3%—
METR Time Horizons63.9%—

Reasoning o4-mini leads

o4-mini: 24.6 (#162), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles26%0%
ARC-AGI-26.1%—
SimpleBench38.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.6%—
ARC-AGI-158.7%—
CritPt0.6%—
EnigmaEval9.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1351—
Mystery Game Puzzles5%—
DTBench77.6%—
LMCA26.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.64—
ForecastBench61.8—

Math o4-mini leads

o4-mini: 40.8 (#89), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202581.7%8.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
Omni-MATH72%—
LMArena Math1389—
MATH Level 597.8%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)24.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)6.3%—

Knowledge o4-mini leads

o4-mini: 43.6 (#91), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond79.6%38%
Humanity's Last Exam18.1%—
SimpleQA Verified19.6%—
MMLU-Pro82%—
Confabulations15.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate18.6%—
GPQA (HELM)73.5%—
LMArena Expert1343—

Multimodal Not comparable

o4-mini: 40.2 (#49), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Vision1194—
GeoBench64%—
VPCT57.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

o4-mini: 47.0 (#154), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1337—
LMArena Chinese1354—
LMArena French1364—
LMArena German1336—
LMArena Japanese1308—
LMArena Korean1312—
LMArena Russian1334—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following Not comparable

o4-mini: 75.2 (#68), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
IFEval92.8%—
LMArena Instruction Following1321—

Long Context Not comparable

o4-mini: 45.5 (#33), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
Fiction.LiveBench77.8%—
LMArena Longer Query1315—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o4-mini: 54.0 (#152), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko4-miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1353—
LMArena Creative Writing1294—
Short-Story Creative Writing75%—
WildBench85.4%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1350—

Frequently asked questions

Is o4-mini better than Qwen3-1.7B?

o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do o4-mini and Qwen3-1.7B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. o4-mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper