Model comparison
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.7 to 30.5.
Side by side
| Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-06-14 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1209 | 1035 |
Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1202 | 1018 |
Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1216 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1206 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1214 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1197 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1219 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1195 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1203 | 1048 |
Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1225 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1225 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1203 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1214 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.