Model comparison

Command R vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.0

Rank #267 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 22.4 to 13.3.

Side by side

Command R and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Command RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.035.3
Released2024-08-302024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked2917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R: 28.8 (#301), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding11701209
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R: 13.3 (#329), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11641202
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R: 25.8 (#244), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math11551216
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Command R: 30.5 (#219), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert11381171
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R: 35.9 (#240), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11741206
LMArena Chinese11821214
LMArena French11611196
LMArena German11761192
LMArena Japanese11431128
LMArena Korean11621148
LMArena Russian11741219
LMArena Spanish11501195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R: 58.3 (#256), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11671203
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Too close to call

Command R: 36.3 (#226), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11981225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Command R: 38.4 (#248), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text11871225
LMArena Creative Writing11701203
LMArena Multi-Turn11631214
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper