Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-7B

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #273 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.7 to 29.6.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.931.4
Released2024-06-142024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Coding12091107

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Hard Prompts12021065

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Math12161080

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Expert11711055
MMLU—62.6%

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Non-English12061058
LMArena Chinese12141141
LMArena Russian12191006
LMArena French1197—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Instruction Following12031058

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Longer Query12251090

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-7B
LMArena Text12251083
LMArena Creative Writing12031035
LMArena Multi-Turn12141062

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper