Model comparison
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen-14B
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.7 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-06-14 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1209 | 1071 |
Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1202 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1216 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1206 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1214 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1197 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1219 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1195 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1203 | 1031 |
Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1225 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1225 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1203 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1214 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen-14B?
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.