Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen1.5-7B
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 55.9 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1107 |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1065 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1380 | 1080 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1405 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1058 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.