Model comparison
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads 50.8 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1296 | 1107 |
Reasoning Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1311 | 1065 |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1253 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1277 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1269 | 1006 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1293 | 1058 |
Long Context Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1308 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1315 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.