Noometry

Model comparison

Command R vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 55.9 to 38.2.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command RNemotron 3 Super
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.440.1
Released2024-08-302026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.45
Results tracked2921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Coding11691403
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—
ALE-Bench—213.9

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Hard Prompts11641386
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math11551380
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert11381398
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English11741355
LMArena Chinese11821432
LMArena French11621405
LMArena German11761341
LMArena Russian11741336
LMArena Spanish11511417
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1163—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following11671347
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query11981362

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text11871378
LMArena Creative Writing11701317
LMArena Multi-Turn11631369
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Is Command R or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Nemotron 3 Super share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper