Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Wizardlm 13b
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 56.1 to 30.7.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1035 |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1381 | 1017 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1356 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1404 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1049 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Wizardlm 13b?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.