Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Olmo 3 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.1

Rank #182 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.6 to 49.2.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index49.938.1
Released2026-04-08—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14971318
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14861302
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.32—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14771315
ProofBench39%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14801272
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1292—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14711255
LMArena Chinese15181300
LMArena French14941291
LMArena German14661290
LMArena Russian14821255
LMArena Japanese1445—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14571275

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14631296

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14791300
LMArena Creative Writing14401256
LMArena Multi-Turn14841289
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper