Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Olmo 3 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.7

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 25.9.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index50.338.7
Released2026-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14951319
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14861302
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14711316
ProofBench43%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14801273
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14781255
LMArena Chinese15111300
LMArena French15131291
LMArena Russian14871254
LMArena German—1290
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14611275

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14751296

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14821300
LMArena Creative Writing14491256
LMArena Multi-Turn14941290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper