Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 48.7.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index38.649.9
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding13071498
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12861486
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.21

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math12811483
ProofBench—39%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert12761478
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English12651472
LMArena Chinese13461518
LMArena Russian12661483
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following12771457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query13411462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text12881479
LMArena Creative Writing12641437
LMArena Multi-Turn12841485
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper