Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 35.0.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Olmo 3 32b Think specifications
Muse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index50.638.7
Released2026-04-08—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2714

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14811319
SciCode51.5%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14741302
CritPt11.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14551316
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14571273
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14641255
LMArena Chinese15091300
LMArena French14971291
LMArena German14971290
LMArena Russian14661254
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14421275

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14511296

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14741300
LMArena Creative Writing14591256
LMArena Multi-Turn14771290

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper