Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 38.5.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1417 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.