Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.5 to 41.2.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1319 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1302 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1316 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1273 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1275 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.