Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 47.4.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1399 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.6 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.