Model comparison
Mixtral 8x22B vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x22B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.5 to 15.1.
Side by side
| Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-04-17 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1166 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| WeirdML | 3.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 64.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1150 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| DTBench | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1184 | 1417 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 24.2% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1113 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 46% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 33.4% | — |
| MMLU | 77.8% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1128 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1116 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1158 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1166 | — |
| LMArena German | 1141 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1037 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1147 | 1375 |
| IFEval | 72.4% | — |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1144 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1162 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1141 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1130 | 1399 |
| WildBench | 71.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mixtral 8x22B better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mixtral 8x22B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.